Tipo
Artigo de revista
Título
Deciding without deliberating
Data
2013
Ementa

Sumário:Not all courts are alike (and neither are legislatures) -- The key idea : deliberation -- Why deliberate : Sharing previously unshared information. Attenuating the effects of bounded rationality -- Deliberation in courts : some preliminaries : Collegiality. Deliberation: winning or deciding? Deliberation and aggregation, consensus and majority -- Judicial review in Brazil: a short introduction -- Judicial procedures as obstacles to deliberation : Non-deliberative from the outset: the role of the justice rapporteur. Opinion reading and equality in the deliberation. Time to think, but alone: interrupting the plenary session. Keeping previously unshared information private. Reinforcing bounded rationality -- Judicial practices as obstacles to deliberation : Winning at any cost (or "acting like a lawyer"). Lack of a consensus-oriented interaction and the reasons for the judicial individualism. The downside of extreme publicity. Dissenting and defeated opinions.

Classificação (CDDir)
341.4
 
DIREITO PÚBLICO [ 341 ]
» DIREITO PROCESSUAL [ 341.4 ]

Publicação: Texto - Inglês

 
2013
International journal of constitutional law
   Imprenta: New York, Oxford University Press, New York University School of Law, 2003.
   Referência: v. 11, n. 3, p. 557–584, July, 2013.
   Disponibilidade: Rede Virtual de Bibliotecas
   Localização:  STF

2023-01-29T00:47:14.000Z [ 9600863 ]